Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1393

reference
631-tree-1
name
1393
tree-preservation-order

undefined

631-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.022998 50.880909)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.022927 50.880902,-1.022930 50.880916,-1.022940 50.880928,-1.022956 50.880938,-1.022975 50.880945,-1.022997 50.880947,-1.023019 50.880945,-1.023039 50.880939,-1.023055 50.880929,-1.023065 50.880917,-1.023069 50.880903,-1.023066 50.880889,-1.023056 50.880876,-1.023041 50.880866,-1.023021 50.880860,-1.022999 50.880857,-1.022977 50.880860,-1.022957 50.880866,-1.022941 50.880876,-1.022931 50.880888,-1.022927 50.880902)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL